Robert Cialdini is recognised as an authority on persuasion. His latest book Yes: 50 Secrets from the Science of Persuasion co-authored with Noah Goldstein and Steve Martin has many nuggets for presenters. I’ll be reviewing these in a series of posts. Here’s the first one:
We are strongly persuaded by what people like us do.
In the book Cialdini and his co-authors outline a series of experiments on the cards in hotel bathrooms attempting to persuade us to reuse the towels. The standard appeal on these cards is to our concern for the environment. The authors experimented with changes to the wording on these cards. Here’s what they found:
- Guests who were told that most other guests reused their towels, were 26% more likely to reuse their towels than those who saw the standard message.
- Guests who were told that most other guests who stayed in their particular room, were 33% more likely to reuse their towels than those who saw the standard message.
So what does this mean when you are seeking to persuade in a presentation.
1. If other people are doing or supporting what you want your audience to do, bring that into your presentation. Here are some ways of doing that:
- find an endorsement from a credible expert that your audience knows and trusts
- use testimonials from people similar to your audience
- develop case studies of people/organisations that are similar to your audience
- use statistics to show how many people are using your product or taking action (this is taking it from the micro to the macro).
2. Be subtle about the way that you do this. If you tell people “Of course, you’re going to be persuaded by what other people have done” this will backfire on you. When Cialdini asked people whether other people’s behaviour influences their own, they insisted that it did not. We don’t like to think of ourselves as simply doing what other people do.
3. If you’re trying to persuade your audience not to do something, don’t focus on the number of people who are doing it. The implicit message that people will take away is that other people are doing it, and therefore it’s OK. Cialdini gives an example of a sign at Arizona’s Petrified Forest National Park which said:
Your heritage is being vandalized every day by theft losses of petrified wood of 14 tons a year, mostly a small piece at a time.
The book authors experimented with these signs. They used marked pieces of petrified wood along the trails to see how much visitors would steal. When there was no sign 2.92% of the pieces were stolen. When the sign above was used, 7.92% of the pieces were stolen! So despite the good intentions of the National Park management they were actually promoting the stealing of petrified wood.
Persuasion based on what other people do is called using “Social Proof”. As you can see it’s a powerful persuasive tool for using – with care and discretion – in your presentations.
In the next post in this series, I’ll look at the surprising results that Cialdini and his co-authors report on the use of negativity in persuasive messages.
It’s a handy book alright! A very easy read.
That said, the whole concept of Social Proof and so on is often hard to bring into presentations, isn’t it. I suggest that, essentially, because a large percentage of our clients are giving “cutting edge” presentations – by which I mean they’re presenting on something so new that, almost by definition, there’s precious little other work out there that they can make reference to.
If there was, they’d not need to make the presentation. 🙂
Okay, there are ways around it, I know but it’s something to think about.
Cheers…. Simon
Social proof is great. You can use it to influence people, but they’ll just think that they came to their decision independently. 😉
Social Proof is not ‘great’. Jesus Christ. Its one of the most fundamental problems on this earth.
It is why people do nothing during a genocide. In fact in Rwanda, it was a major factor in why the Hutu population took to the streets and chopped up all the Tutsis they could find with machetes. Its why everything from slavery to Blairism was tolerated and followed. It is why government propaganda is followed, why people use LifeLog (Facebook, Instagram etc) and Apple products, and why people do incredidibly stupid things – following eachother as zombies without any independent thought.
It is also why good people with great things to contribute to humanity and the word in general, never get heard. It is why we have marginalised people and silent victims of society.
So no, Social Proof isnt fucking ‘great’. Its pure evil.
Can that evil be leveraged by a marketer like yourself with the requisite approval? Yes.
But frankly, should it be? Not for someone capable of saying that! Fortunately for you, most people dont think for themselves…
Many thanks regarding the awsome article. I am going to keep an eye on your own blog, i allready added it to personal list 🙂